4.6 Article

Effect of Cavβ Subunits on Structural Organization of Cav1.2 Calcium Channels

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005587

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 AG000294] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Voltage-gated Ca(v)1.2 calcium channels play a crucial role in Ca2+ signaling. The pore-forming alpha(1C) subunit is regulated by accessory Ca-v beta subunits, cytoplasmic proteins of various size encoded by four different genes (Ca-v beta(1) - beta(4)) and expressed in a tissue-specific manner. Methods and Results: Here we investigated the effect of three major Ca-v beta types, beta(1b), beta(2d) and beta(3), on the structure of Ca(v)1.2 in the plasma membrane of live cells. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy showed that the tendency of Ca(v)1.2 to form clusters depends on the type of the Ca-v beta subunit present. The highest density of Ca(v)1.2 clusters in the plasma membrane and the smallest cluster size were observed with neuronal/cardiac beta(1b) present. Ca(v)1.2 channels containing beta(3), the predominant Ca-v beta subunit of vascular smooth muscle cells, were organized in a significantly smaller number of larger clusters. The inter- and intramolecular distances between alpha(1C) and Ca-v beta in the plasma membrane of live cells were measured by three-color FRET microscopy. The results confirm that the proximity of Ca(v)1.2 channels in the plasma membrane depends on the Ca-v beta type. The presence of different Ca-v beta subunits does not result in significant differences in the intramolecular distance between the termini of alpha(1C), but significantly affects the distance between the termini of neighbor alpha(1C) subunits, which varies from 67 angstrom with beta(1b) to 79 A with beta(3). Conclusions: Thus, our results show that the structural organization of Ca(v)1.2 channels in the plasma membrane depends on the type of Ca-v beta subunits present.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据