4.5 Article

Platelet adhesion in the sinusoid caused hepatic injury by neutrophils after hepatic ischemia reperfusion

期刊

PLATELETS
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 282-288

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/09537101003637265

关键词

Intravital microscopy (IVM); hepatic ischemia reperfusion (I/R); neutrophil elastase inhibitor; sivelestat; adherent platelets

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT)
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22591499] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liver ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is one of the most serious complications of hepatic surgery. In I/R, activated Kupffer cells cause platelet adhesion to sinusoidal endothelium as well as neutrophils and cause liver dysfunction. The aim of this study was to evaluate platelet dynamics in the hepatic microcirculation after I/R by intravital microscopy (IVM) and to clarify the relationship between platelet adhesion and neutrophil activation. Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were divided into two groups: the control (administration of saline) group and the sivelestat group in which neutrophil activation was suppressed by sivelestat before I/R. The number of adherent platelets in sinusoid was observed up to 120 minutes after I/R by IVM. Samples of liver tissue and blood were taken for examination of histological findings, liver enzymes and inflammatory cytokines. The number of adherent platelets was significantly increased after I/R in both groups. Compared with the control group, the number of adherent platelets significantly decreased after hepatic I/R in the sivelestat group. Moreover, sivelestat improved changes of histological findings and elevation of liver enzymes. However, there was no significant difference in inflammatory cytokines of TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta or IL-6. Platelet adhesion in the sinusoid is associated with liver dysfunction after I/R as well as neutrophils. Activated neutrophils induce platelet adhesion in the sinusoid of the liver.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据