4.6 Article

Wound Healing in the Upper and Lower Extremities: A Systematic Review on the Use of Acellular Dermal Matrices

期刊

PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
卷 130, 期 5, 页码 232S-241S

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182615703

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Use of biologically engineered acellular dermal matrices in the upper and lower extremities is increasingly recognized as a means of achieving definitive healing in the setting of both acute and chronic injuries but data and evidence supporting their use are limited. The authors performed this systematic review to identify all available evidence for the use of matrices in nonburn extremity reconstruction. Methods: A systematic review of the Cochrane and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify all reports of the application of matrices in wounds of the upper and lower extremities. Reports that included fewer than five patients and that involved cellular seeding, nonhuman studies, and burn injuries were excluded. Studies were evaluated for quality of statistical measures and outcomes, and a level of evidence was assigned in accordance with the American Society of Plastic Surgeons' Rating Levels of Evidence. Results: Of an initial 2422 reports, 13 primary reports were identified (10 case series and three randomized controlled trials) representing a total of 432 patients and 441 discrete wounds. After evidence review, 10 of these studies represented level IV evidence, two studies represented level II evidence, and one study achieved level I evidence. Conclusions: Extremity wound management continues to rely on adequate vascular supply, debridement with eradication of infection, off-loading, and/or immobilization. Current data, although limited, appear to support the use of acellular dermal matrices in chronic and acute injuries where there is exposed bone, tendon, and/or muscle. They may provide a simple technique to achieve timely and durable tissue coverage in extremity wounds. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 130 (Suppl. 2): 232S, 2012.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据