4.3 Article

Flying focus and its application to plasma-based laser amplifiers

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6587/aada63

关键词

stimulated Raman scattering; flying focus; Raman amplification; plasma-based laser amplifier; ionization wave

资金

  1. US Department of Energy Office of Fusion Energy Sciences [DE-SC0016253]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-NA0001944]
  3. University of Rochester
  4. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combining a chirped laser pulse with a chromatic lens yields a flying focus-a laser focus that moves dynamically in time. This provides control over the propagation of the peak laser intensity within an extended focal region that can be many times larger than the system's Rayleigh length. Any velocity is achievable, including backward relative to the laser propagation direction. Previous simulation results have shown that a laser beam with a flying focus can create a counter-propagating ionization wave and subsequently pump a frequency-downshifted laser via the stimulated Raman scattering instability. Compared to a conventional Raman amplification scheme, several advantages were highlighted, including improved temperature control, plasma uniformity, and precursor growth mitigation. Here, we extend those results to demonstrate additional benefits: (1) the flying focus makes it possible for an unseeded Raman amplifier to produce a short, high-intensity beam; and (2) the flying focus minimizes collisional absorption of the pump, facilitating amplifier operation at higher plasma densities. Preliminary experiments have laid the groundwork for a high-performance plasma-based laser amplifier. The focal spot dynamics were initially confirmed at low intensity. It was subsequently demonstrated that ionization waves of arbitrary velocity can be produced at higher intensity. Here, we show a counter-propagating ionization front moving at approximately the speed of light-the optimal result for a Raman amplifier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据