4.1 Article

Effect of the specialist herbivore Luehdorfia puziloi on the performance of a woodland herbaceous plant, Asarum heterotropoides

期刊

PLANT SPECIES BIOLOGY
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 61-67

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-1984.2009.00263.x

关键词

Aristolochiaceae; plant growth; plant performance; seed production; specialist herbivore; timing of herbivory

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Scientific Research [19570011, 21657006]
  2. Clark Memorial Foundation
  3. Sasakawa Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19570011, 21657006] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plants show many responses to herbivore damage caused by insects. We investigated the effect of the specialist leaf herbivore Luehdorfia puziloi on the performance of a deciduous forest understory perennial herb Asarum heterotropoides. We conducted artificial defoliation experiments with different levels of damage (0, 50 or 100% clipping) in the early growing period (flowering time: early May) and in the late growing period (when natural herbivory by L. puziloi larvae occurs: early June) in a natural population. Effects of the defoliation treatments on reproduction (seed-set ratio) of A. heterotropoides in the treated year and on survival and development of the plant in the subsequent year were investigated. Severe defoliation conducted in the early period resulted in less current-year seed production and increased regression to a dormant or non-reproductive stage in the following year, which would reduce the probability of future flowering. In contrast, defoliation conducted in the late period had no effect on the reproduction, survival and development of A. heterotropoides. Similarly, we found no obvious correlation between the damaged leaf area during the later period and seed set. Our results show that the specialist herbivore L. puziloi did not influence the performance of A. heterotropoides by damaging the plant later in the season when it was tolerant of damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据