4.7 Article

A framework for molecular genetic assessment of a transgenic watermelon rootstock line

期刊

PLANT SCIENCE
卷 176, 期 6, 页码 805-811

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.03.007

关键词

CGMMV-CP; Rootstock; Sat; Scion; Transgenic; Watermelon

资金

  1. Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology Research Initiative Program
  2. Crop Functional Genomics Center
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology
  4. BioGreen 21 Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transgenic plants over-expressing virus coat protein genes have attracted particular interest from researchers recently, due primarily to their tolerance to viral infection. The transgenic watermelon rootstock analyzed in this study contains the introduced cucumber green mottle mosaic virus coat protein (CGMMV-CP) gene. The primary objective of this study was to determine the copy number, integration site, and expression level of the transgene element, in order to establish a scientific framework for the molecular genetic assessment of transgenic plant rootstocks. The results of our Southern blot analysis indicated that a single copy of the CGMMV-CP gene was inserted into the genome of a transgenic watermelon rootstock. We also identified the genomic sequences flanking the integration site of the transgene via inverse PCR analysis. In an effort to find a sequence usable as an internal positive control for the screening of the transgenic watermelons, we determined that the Sat gene appears as one copy within their genomes and is watermelon-specific. The information from the integrated site and the internal positive control sequence was utilized to establish a new event-specific PCR-based detection method. The expression of both CGMMV-CP mRNA and protein was detected in the transgenic watermelon rootstocks but not in watermelon scions, thereby suggesting that the tissues of the watermelon scions are free of the introduced gene products. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据