4.3 Article

Roles of Forkhead-box Transcription Factors in Controlling Development, Pathogenicity, and Stress Response in Magnaporthe oryzae

期刊

PLANT PATHOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 136-150

出版社

KOREAN SOC PLANT PATHOLOGY
DOI: 10.5423/PPJ.OA.02.2014.0018

关键词

forkhead-box transcription factor; fungal development; Magnaporthe oryzae; pathogenicity; stress response

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-0061897, 2013-003196]
  2. Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ00821201]
  3. Brain Korea 21 Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although multiple transcription factors (TFs) have been characterized via mutagenesis to understand their roles in controlling pathogenicity and infection-related development in Magnaporthe oryzae, the causal agent of rice blast, if and how forkhead-box (FOX) TFs contribute to these processes remain to be characterized. Four putative FOX TF genes were identified in the genome of M. oryzae, and phylogenetic analysis suggested that two of them (MoFKII1 and MoHCM1) correspond to Ascomycota-specific members of the FOX TF family while the others (MoF0X1 and MoF0X2) are Pezizomycotina-specific members. Deletion of MoFKH1 (Delta MofIchl) resulted in reduced mycelial growth and conidial germination, abnormal septation and stress response, and reduced virulence. Similarly, Delta Mohcm1 exhibited reduced mycelial growth and conidial germination. Conidia of Delta Mofkh1 and Delta Mohcm1 were more sensitive to one or both of the cell cycle inhibitors hydroxyurea and benomyl, suggesting their role in cell cycle control. On the other hand, loss of MoFOX1 (Delta Mofoxl) did not show any noticeable changes in development, pathogenicity, and stress response. Deletion of MoF0X2 was not successful even after repeated attempts. Taken together, these results suggested that MoFKH1 and MoHCM1 are important in fungal development and that MoFKH1 is further implicated in pathogenicity and stress response in M. oryzae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据