4.6 Article

MiR-9a-5p regulates proliferation and migration of hepatic stellate cells under pressure through inhibition of Sirt1

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 21, 期 34, 页码 9900-9915

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9900

关键词

MicroRNA; miR-9a-5p; Sirt1; Pressure; Hepatic stellate cells

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11272342/A0205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AIM: To reveal the functions of microRNAs (miRNAs) with respect to hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) in response to portal hypertension. METHODS: Primary rat HSCs were exposed to static water pressure (10 mmHg, 1 h) and the pressure-induced miRNA expression profile was detected by next-generation sequencing. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to verify the expression of miRNAs. A potential target of MiR-9a-5p was measured by a luciferase reporter assay and Western blot. CCK-8 assay and Transwell assay were used to detect the proliferation and migration of HSCs under pressure. RESULTS: According to the profile, the expression of miR-9a-5p was further confirmed to be significantly increased after pressure overload in HSCs (3.70 +/- 0.61 vs 0.97 +/- 0.15, P = 0.0226), which resulted in the proliferation, migration and activation of HSCs. In vivo, the up-regulation of miR-9a-5p (2.09 +/- 0.91 vs 4.27 +/- 1.74, P = 0.0025) and the down-regulation of Sirt1 (2.41 +/- 0.51 vs 1.13 +/- 0.11, P = 0.0006) were observed in rat fibrotic liver with portal hypertension. Sirt1 was a potential target gene of miR-9a-5p. Through restoring the expression of Sirt1 in miR-9a-5p transfected HSCs on pressure overload, we found that overexpression of Sirt1 could partially abrogate the miR-9a-5p mediated suppression of the proliferation, migration and activation of HSCs. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that during liver fibrosis, portal hypertension may induce the proliferation, migration and activation of HSCs through the up-regulation of miR-9a-5p, which targets Sirt1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据