4.4 Article

Selection of Reference Genes for Normalizing Gene Expression During Seed Priming and Germination Using qPCR in Zea mays and Spinacia oleracea

期刊

PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 478-487

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11105-011-0354-x

关键词

Housekeeping genes; BestKeeper; geNorm; NormFinder; Maize; Spinach

资金

  1. Hatch Act [3601]
  2. State of Iowa
  3. Seed Science Center
  4. Plant Science Institute
  5. Department of Horticulture at Iowa State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qPCR) has been widely used to investigate gene expression during seed germination, a process involving seed transition from dry/physiologically inactive to hydrated/active state. This transition may result in altered expression of many housekeeping genes (HKGs), conventionally used as internal controls, thereby posing a challenge about selection of HKGs in such scenarios. The objectives of this study included identifying valid reference genes for seed priming and germination studies, both of which involve the transition of seed hydration status, and assessing whether or not findings derived from the seed model used in this study would also be applicable to other plant species. Eight commonly used HKGs were evaluated in maize seeds during hydropriming and germination. Using Bestkeeper, geNorm, and NormFinder, we provided a rank of stability for these HKGs. Actdf, UBQ, beta tub, 18S, Act, and GAPDH were adjudged as valid internal controls by geNorm and NormFinder. Under the second objective, we conducted a case study with spinach seeds collected during osmopriming and germination. Our results indicate that the conclusions derived from maize were applicable to spinach as well, in that 18S exhibited greater expression stability than GAPDH in osmoprimed and germinated seeds; this held true even under stress conditions. While both of these genes were rejected by BestKeeper, we found that 18S exhibited stable expression when dry and hydrated seeds were analyzed as separate data sets. Although this approach precludes the comparison between hydrated and dry seeds, it still provides effective comparison among samples of same hydration status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据