期刊
PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTER
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 369-378出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11105-010-0239-4
关键词
RNA extraction; Gene expression
资金
- SAGES Program of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
- Canada-China AAFC-MOE
New platforms allow quantification of gene expression from large, replicated experiments but current sampling protocols for plant tissue using immediate flash freezing in liquid nitrogen are a barrier to these high-throughput studies. In this study, we compared four sampling methods for RNA extraction for gene expression analysis: (1) the standard sampling method of flash freezing whole leaves in liquid nitrogen immediately upon removal from the plant; (2) incubation of excised leaf disks for 2 min at field temperature followed by flash freezing; (3) incubation of excised leaf disks for 1 h on ice followed by flash freezing; and (4) incubation of excised leaf disks for 1 h at field temperature followed by flash freezing. Gene expression analysis was done for 23 genes using nCounter, and normalization of the data was done using the geometric mean of five housekeeping genes. Quality of RNA was highest for protocol A and lowest for protocol D. Despite some differences in RNA quality, gene expression was not significantly different among protocols A, B, and C for any of the 23 genes. Expression of some genes was significantly different between protocol D and the other protocols. This study demonstrates that when sampling leaf disks for gene expression analysis, the time between tissue removal from the plant and flash freezing in liquid nitrogen can be extended. This increase in time allowable during sampling provides greater flexibility in sampling large replicated field experiments for statistical analysis of gene expression data.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据