4.8 Article

A subcellular tug of war involving three MYB-like proteins underlies a molecular antagonism in Antirrhinum flower asymmetry

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 75, 期 4, 页码 527-538

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12225

关键词

RADIALIS; DIVARICATA; molecular antagonism; myb-like proteins; Antirrhinum majus; dorsoventral asymmetry

资金

  1. FCT/COMPETE/FEDER [FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-008818]
  2. Royal Society [2008/R2]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BD/75050/2010]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/J/00000152] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/75050/2010] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The establishment of meristematic domains with different transcriptional activity is essential for many developmental processes. The asymmetry of the Antirrhinum majus flower is established by transcription factors with an asymmetric pattern of activity. To understand how this asymmetrical pattern is established, we studied the molecular mechanism through which the dorsal MYB protein RADIALIS (RAD) restricts the activity of the MYB transcription factor DIVARICATA (DIV) to the ventral region of the flower meristem. We show that RAD competes with DIV for binding with other MYB-like proteins, termed DRIF1 and DRIF2 (DIV- and-RAD-interacting-factors). DRIF1 and DIV interact to form a protein complex that binds to the DIV-DNA consensus region, suggesting that the DRIFs act as co-regulators of DIV transcriptional activity. In the presence of RAD, the interaction between DRIF1 and DIV bound to DNA is disrupted. Moreover, the DRIFs are sequestered in the cytoplasm by RAD, thus, preventing or reducing the formation of DRIF-DIV heterodimers in the nuclei. Our results suggest that in the dorsal region of the Antirrhinum flower meristem the dorsal protein RAD antagonises the activity of the ventral identity protein DIV in a subcellular competition for a DRIF protein promoting the establishment of the asymmetric pattern of gene activity in the Antirrhinum flower.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据