4.8 Article

Replication factor C1 (RFC1) is required for double-strand break repair during meiotic homologous recombination in Arabidopsis

期刊

PLANT JOURNAL
卷 73, 期 1, 页码 154-165

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.12024

关键词

double-strand break; repair; chromosome; fertility; meiosis; Arabidopsis thaliana

资金

  1. Major State Basic Research Program of China [2012CB944801, 2013CB126903]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Education [311026]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30970277]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Replication factor C1 (RFC1), which is conserved in eukaryotes, is involved in DNA replication and checkpoint control. However, a RFC1 product participating in DNA repair at meiosis has not been reported in Arabidopsis. Here, we report functional characterization of AtRFC1 through analysis of the rfc1-2 mutant. The rfc1-2 mutant displayed normal vegetative growth but showed silique sterility because the male gametophyte was arrested at the uninucleus microspore stage and the female at the functional megaspore stage. Expression of AtRFC1 was concentrated in the reproductive organ primordia, meiocytes and developing gametes. Chromosome spreads showed that pairing and synapsis were normal, and the chromosomes were broken when desynapsis began at late prophase I, and chromosome fragments remained in the subsequent stages. For this reason, homologous chromosomes and sister chromatids segregated unequally, leading to pollen sterility. Immunolocalization revealed that the AtRFC1 protein localized to the chromosomes during zygotene and pachytene in wild-type but were absent in the spo11-1 mutant. The chromosome fragmentation of rfc1-2 was suppressed by spo11-1, indicating that AtRFC1 acted downstream of AtSPO11-1. The similar chromosome behavior of rad51 rfc1-2 and rad51 suggests that AtRFC1 may act with AtRAD51 in the same pathway. In summary, AtRFC1 is required for DNA double-strand break repair during meiotic homologous recombination of Arabidopsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据