4.7 Article

Auxin-induced resistance to common scab disease of potato linked to inhibition of thaxtomin A toxicity

期刊

PLANT DISEASE
卷 92, 期 9, 页码 1321-1328

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-92-9-1321

关键词

-

资金

  1. Horticulture Australia Limited (HAL)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Production of the phytotoxin thaxtomin A by pathogenic Streptomyces spp. is essential for induction of common scab disease in potato. Prior studies have shown that foliar application of Sublethal concentrations of 2,4-dichloroplicnoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and other auxin or auxin-like compounds significantly reduced severity and Occurrence of common scab in subsequently produced tubers. However, the means of disease Suppression by these compounds was not known. We confirm the disease suppressive activity of 2.4-D. Detailed tuber physiological examination showed that lenticel numbers, lenticel external dimensions, and periderm thickness and structure, physiological features believed to be critical to Streptomyces scabiei infection, were not substantially changed by 2.4-D treatments. negating a possible mechanism for disease suppression through alteration Of these structures. In contrast, our studies show accumulation of 2,4-D in tubers of treated plants occurs and is associated with an enhanced tolerance to thaxtomin A. Applying 2A-D to Cultures of S. scabiei did no(significantly alter in vitro growth of the pathogen. Thaxtomin A production by the pathogen was inhibited by 2,4-D, but Only at the highest rate tested (1.0 mM), which is at least 200-fold more than is found in 2.4-D treated tubers. These data suggest 2,4-D has no direct effect oil the pathogen or its virulence. Confirmatory evidence from studies with Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings demonstrated that the auxins 2,4-D and IAA ameliorate thaxtomin A toxicity. The evidence presented whereby auxin treatment inhibits toxicity of thaxtomin A secreted by the pathogen suggests a novel indirect means Of disease suppression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据