4.7 Article

Identification of MV-generated ROS responsive EST clones in floral buds of Litchi chinensis Sonn.

期刊

PLANT CELL REPORTS
卷 32, 期 9, 页码 1361-1372

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-013-1448-8

关键词

Flowering; Suppression subtractive hybridization; Reactive oxygen species; Litchi

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [31071760]
  2. Ministry of Agriculture [CARS-33-08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A suppression subtractive hybridization library was constructed using inflorescence primordia of 'Nuomici' litchi to identify EST clones responsive to MV-generated ROS. 93 ESTs could be aligned as unique gene sequences in the inflorescence primordia of litchi. Litchi is an evergreen woody tree widely cultivated in subtropical and tropical regions. However, defective flowering is a pending problem of litchi production. Our previous study indicated that reactive oxygen species (ROS) induced by methyl viologen dichloride hydrate (MV) promotes flowering in litchi. In the present study, a suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) library was constructed using inflorescence primordia of 'Nuomici' with the aim to find out ROS responsive clones during floral differentiation. 1856 Expressed sequence tag (EST) clones were randomly selected. Clones carrying single exogenous fragments were screened by reverse northern analysis to identify those responsive to MV-generated ROS. A total of 783 differentially expressed EST clones were identified as MV responsive cDNA and were subjected to sequencing. Among them, 26 clones were represented more than three times. 783 clones were aligned to 93 unique gene sequences. The unique genes were classified into 9 categories. 16 % of them were involved in transport facilitation, 11 % in transcription regulation, 4 % in stress response, 9 % in carbohydrate metabolism, 1 % in secondary metabolism, 14 % in intracellular signaling, and 25 % in other metabolism, while 9 % were genes with unknown functions and 11 % were genes with no match in the database.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据