4.8 Article

Site-Specific N-Glycosylation of the S-Locus Receptor Kinase and Its Role in the Self-Incompatibility Response of the Brassicaceae

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 26, 期 12, 页码 4749-4762

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.114.131987

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-1146725]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1146725] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26892004] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The S-locus receptor kinase SRK is a highly polymorphic transmembrane kinase of the stigma epidermis. Through allelespecific interaction with its pollen coat-localized ligand, the S-locus cysteine-rich protein SCR, SRK is responsible for recognition and inhibition of self pollen in the self-incompatibility response of the Brassicaceae. The SRK extracellular ligand binding domain contains several potential N-glycosylation sites that exhibit varying degrees of conservation among SRK variants. However, the glycosylation status and functional importance of these sites are currently unclear. We investigated this issue in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana stigmas that express the Arabidopsis lyrata SRKb variant and exhibit an incompatible response toward SCRb-expressing pollen. Analysis of single-and multiple-glycosylation site mutations of SRKb demonstrated that, although five of six potential N-glycosylation sites in SRKb are glycosylated in stigmas, N-glycosylation is not important for SCRb-dependent activation of SRKb. Rather, N-glycosylation functions primarily to ensure the proper and efficient subcellular trafficking of SRK to the plasma membrane. The study provides insight into the function of a receptor that regulates a critical phase of the plant life cycle and represents a valuable addition to the limited information available on the contribution of N-glycosylation to the subcellular trafficking and function of plant receptor kinases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据