4.7 Article

Nitrogen partitioning in oak leaves depends on species, provenance, climate conditions and soil type

期刊

PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 15, 期 -, 页码 198-209

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00658.x

关键词

Acidic soil; air warming; amino acids; calcareous soil; drought; nitrogen metabolites; Quercus; soluble protein

资金

  1. International Graduate School (University of Freiburg, Germany) [GRK 1305]
  2. European Social Fund
  3. Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Wurttemberg
  4. Velux-Stiftung project [489]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Climate-tolerant tree species and/or provenances have to be selected to ensure the high productivity of managed forests in Central Europe under the prognosticated climate changes. For this purpose, we studied the responses of saplings from three oak species (i.e. Quercus robur, Q. petraea and Q. pubescens) and provenances of different climatic origin (i.e. low or high rainfall, low or high temperature habitats) with regard to leaf nitrogen (N) composition as a measure of N nutrition. Saplings were grown in model ecosystems on either calcareous or acidic soil and subjected to one of four treatments (control, drought, air warming or a combination of drought and air warming). Across species, oak N metabolism responded to the influence of drought and/or air warming with an increase in leaf amino acid N concentration at the expense of structural N. Moreover, provenances or species from drier habitats were more tolerant to the climate conditions applied, as indicated by an increase in amino acid N (comparing species) or soluble protein N (comparing provenances within a species). Furthermore, amino acid N concentrations of oak leaves were significantly higher on calcareous compared to acidic soil. From these results, it can be concluded that seeds from provenances or species originating from drier habitats and - if available - from calcareous soil types may provide a superior seed source for future forest establishment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据