4.7 Article

Evidence for indirect effects of plant diversity and composition on net nitrification

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 330, 期 1-2, 页码 435-445

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-009-0217-5

关键词

Biodiversity; Ecosystem function; Nitrification; Nitrogen cycling; Nonrecursive model; Ponderosa pine forest; Productivity; Species identity

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [DEB-9322706]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abiotic controls on net nitrification rates are well documented, but the potential effects of plants on this important ecosystem process are poorly understood. We evaluated four structural equation models to determine the relative importance of plant community composition, aboveground herbaceous production, and plant species richness on nitrifier abundance and net nitrification following restoration treatments in a ponderosa pine forest. Model selection criteria indicated that species richness was the best predictor of nitrifier abundance, but a model that included community composition effects also had some support in the data. Model results suggest that net nitrification was indirectly related to plant species richness via a positive relationship between species richness and nitrifier abundance. Community composition was indirectly related to nitrifier abundance through its relationship with species richness. Our model indicates that species-rich plant communities dominated by C-3 graminoids and legumes are associated with soils that have high abundances of nitrifiers. This study highlights the complexity of deciphering effects of ecological treatments on a system response when multiple interacting factors are simultaneously affected. Our results suggest that plant diversity and composition can both respond to forest thinning, prescribed fire and fuel manipulations, and can be factors that might indirectly influence an ecosystem process such as nitrification. Ecological restoration treatments designed to increase plant diversity and alter community composition may have cascading effects on below-ground processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据