4.7 Article

Difference in Sodium Spatial Distribution in the Shoot of Two Canola Cultivars Under Saline Stress

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 53, 期 6, 页码 1083-1092

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcs055

关键词

Apoplast; Canola seedlings; NaCl stress; Na+ transport

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30871587, 31172020]
  2. Special Items in Agriculture Programme of China [200903001-05]
  3. Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program of China [2009BADA8B01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among different mechanisms of salt resistance, regulation of ion distribution among various tissues and intracellular compartmentation are of great importance. In this study, we investigated the effects of salt stress on growth, photosynthesis, and Na+ accumulation and distribution in leaf apoplast and symplast of two canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars (NYY 1 and BZY 1). The results showed that the declines in shoot dry mass, leaf water potential and net photosynthetic rate of BZY 1 (salt sensitive) were higher than those of NYY 1 (salt resistant) in response to salt stress. Stomatal limitation to photosynthesis was mainly affected under moderate salinity, whereas the reduction in assimilation rate under severe salt stress was due to both stomatal and non-stomatal limitations. We also found that more Na+ was distributed to leaf veins in NYY 1 than in BZY 1; simultaneously, less Na+ accumulated in the leaf blade in NYY 1 than in BZY 1. The percentage of Na+ in the leaf symplast in NYY 1 was markedly lower than that in BZY 1. Also, Na+ diffusion in leaves through apoplastic and symplastic pathways of BZY 1 was stronger than that in NYY 1, and the transpiration rate in BZY 1, especially at the leaf edges, decreased more than in NYY 1. Our results showed that NYY 1 accumulated less Na+ in the shoot, especially in leaf blades, and confined Na+ to the apoplast to avoid leaf salt toxicity, which could be one reason for the higher resistance of NYY 1 than BZY 1 plants to salt stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据