4.3 Article

The surface energy balance at the Huygens landing site and the moist surface conditions on Titan

期刊

PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 376-385

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2011.11.005

关键词

Titan; Surface; Liquid; Energy balance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Huygens Probe provided a wealth of data concerning the atmosphere of Titan. It also provided tantalizing evidence of a small amount of surface liquid. We have developed a detailed surface energy balance for the Probe landing site. We find that the daily averaged non-radiative fluxes at the surface are 0.7 W m(-2), much larger than the global average value predicted by McKay et al. (1991) of 0.037 W m(-2). Considering the moist surface, the methane and ethane detected by the Probe from the surface is consistent with a ternary liquid of ethane, methane, and nitrogen present on the surface with mole fractions of methane, ethane, and nitrogen of 0.44, 0.34, and 0.22, respectively, and a total mass load of similar to 0.05 kg m(-2). If this liquid is included in the surface energy balance, only a small fraction of the non-radiative energy is due to latent heat release (similar to 10(-3) W m(-2)). If the amount of atmospheric ethane is less than 0.6 x 10(-5), the surface liquid is most likely evaporating over timescales of 5 Titan days, and the moist surface is probably a remnant of a recent precipitation event. If the surface liquid mass loading is increased to 0.5 kg m(-2), then the liquid lifetime increases to 56 Titan days. Our modeling results indicate a dew cycle is unlikely, given that even when the diurnal variation of liquid is in equilibrium, the diurnal mass variation is only 3% of the total liquid. If we assume a high atmospheric mixing ratio of ethane (> 0.6 x 10(-5)), the precipitation of liquid is large (38 cm/Titan year for an ethane mixing ratio of 2 x 10(-5)). Such a flux is many orders of magnitude in excess of the photochemical production rate of ethane. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据