4.3 Article

Isotopic evolution of the major constituents of Titan's atmosphere based on Cassini data

期刊

PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE
卷 57, 期 14-15, 页码 1917-1930

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2009.06.005

关键词

Titan; Atmospheric evolution; Isotopes; Atmospheric escape

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using Cassini ion neutral mass spectrometer stable isotope observations, we have developed a comprehensive method for modeling the time-evolution of the stable isotopic ratios in Titan's major constituents, N-2, CH4 and H-2. Our model provides constraints on the initial N-14/N-15 ratio in N-2, the time scale for the outgassing of methane from the interior, and the initial D/H ratio in methane. Over geologic time scales, the isotopes are fractionated by diffusion, atmospheric escape and photochemistry. Diffusion and escape preferentially remove the lighter isotopes for all constituents. Photolysis of methane also removes the lighter isotopes. while photolysis of nitrogen preferentially removes the heavier isotopes. We have found the following: (I) even taking past hydrodynamic escape into consideration, the initial N-14/N-15 ratio in N-2 cannot have changed much from its current value as the result of atmospheric processes. This is due to the large amount of N-2 that must be fractionated. High-rate loss processes, such as hydrodynamic escape, are inefficient fractionators and take a very long time to change the isotopic ratio. On the other hand, low-rate loss processes are efficient fractionators, but also take a very long time to influence a large inventory. (2) The Current inventory of methane represents the remnant of methane that, constrained by the C-12/C-13 ratio, began outgassing from the interior more than 60 million years ago, resulting in a total inventory of 3-4 times the current inventory cycling through the system during this time period. Methane production is likely to be ongoing. (3) The initial D/H in methane was found to be 6.96-11.3. 10(-5). (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据