4.5 Article

Protective effects of hydrogen-rich saline in preeclampsia rat model

期刊

PLACENTA
卷 32, 期 9, 页码 681-686

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2011.06.020

关键词

Preeclampsia; Oxidative stress; Antioxidant; Hydrogen-rich saline; N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; Rats

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen has been reported as a novel antioxidant to selectively reduce levels of toxic reactive-oxygen species (ROS). We investigated the effects of hydrogen-rich saline on the prevention of oxidative injuries in N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) induced rat model of preeclampsia (PE). Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 50) were randomized into five groups: non-pregnant; normal pregnancy; pregnancy + hydrogen saline, 5 ml/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.); pregnancy + L-NAME, 60 mg/kg (i.p.); pregnancy + L-NAME + hydrogen saline rats. Terminations of pregnancy were performed on day 22 of gestation, when the placentas and kidneys were microscopically inspected; tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), and malonyldialdehyde (MDA) were assessed; and the mean systolic BP, level of proteinuria, resorptions, and pups birth weights were recorded. It was found that the pups of hypertensive gravid rats treated with hydrogen-rich saline presented fewer number of resorptions than those of the group of pregnancy + L-NAME, 60 mg/kg i.p. (P < 0.05). Additionally, hydrogen-rich saline treatment decreased the blood and placental MDA, proteinuria and the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-alpha, IL-1 beta in the placental tissues compared with those in L-NAME-treated rats (all P < 0.05). The mean systolic BP showed no significant difference except on day 22 of gestation (P < 0.05). The preventive administration of hydrogen significantly attenuated the severity of PE, which might be ascribed to a reduction in inflammation response and oxidative stress. It could be concluded that hydrogen can be an effective antioxidant in the management of PE. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据