4.5 Article

Effects of BRAF inhibitors on human melanoma tissue before treatment, early during treatment, and on progression

期刊

PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.12098

关键词

BRAF inhibitors; vemurafenib; dabrafenib; GSK2118436; PLX4032; RG; tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; TILs; Ki-67; necrosis; survival

资金

  1. Cancer Institute New South Wales, Research Fellowship
  2. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship
  3. Cancer Institute New South Wales, Career Development Fellowship
  4. Cancer Institute New South Wales, Clinical Research Fellowship
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia NHMRC [402761]
  6. Cancer Institute NSW [05/TPG/1-01]
  7. Health Department of NSW through Sydney West Area Health Service
  8. Melanoma Foundation of the University of Sydney
  9. Melanoma Institute Australia
  10. Australian Cancer Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) are a standard of care for the treatment of BRAFV600-mutant metastatic melanoma. We analyzed a unique set of serial triplicate human metastatic melanoma tumor biopsies to identify biomarkers of BRAFi response and resistance. Morphologic features and immunohistochemical biomarkers were analyzed in 37 metastatic melanoma biopsies at pretreatment (PRE), early during treatment (EDT), and on progression (PROG) from 15 patients treated with a BRAFi and correlated with response and outcome. At EDT, proliferative markers decreased regardless of response, whereas markers of cell death increased in responders. High expression of nuclear p27 at baseline was the strongest predictor of a poorer OS and predicted worse response. The results show that BRAFi are universally antiproliferative, regardless of clinical response, whereas markers of cell death increased only in responders. The addition of therapies targeting the cell cycle machinery may improve the response and duration of BRAFi, and investigation of the mechanisms of apoptosis may provide additional therapeutic targets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据