4.7 Article

Effect of Curcumin Against PentylenetetrazolInduced Seizure Threshold in Mice: Possible Involvement of Adenosine A1 Receptors

期刊

PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 714-721

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ptr.5048

关键词

curcumin; pentylenetetrazol; adenosine receptors; CHA; DPCPX; CPCA; CSC

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Curcumin, obtained from Curcuma longa, has been in use for manifold human disorders. The present study explores the effect of curcumin against pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) seizure threshold in mice. The possible involvement of adenosine receptor(s) mechanism was also investigated. Minimal dose of PTZ (i.v., mg/kg) needed to induce different phases of convulsions were recorded as an index of seizure threshold. Curcumin (20-120mg/kg, p.o.) produced an increase in seizure threshold for convulsions induced by PTZ i.v. infusion. The anticonvulsant effect of curcumin (80mg/kg) was prevented by 8-phenyltheophylline (0.5mg/kg, i.p., non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist) and 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (5mg/kg, i.p., adenosine A(1) receptor antagonist) but not by 8-(3-cholorostryl)caffeine (4mg/kg, i.p., adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist). Further, 5-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (0.005mg/kg, i.p., non-selective A(1)/A(2) receptor agonist), or N-6-cyclohexyladenosine (0.2mg/kg, i.p., adenosine A(1) receptor agonist), was able to potentiate the anticonvulsant action of curcumin. In contrast, 5-(N-cyclopropyl) carboxamidoadenosine (0.1mg/kg, i.p., adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist) failed to potentiate the effect of curcumin. This study demonstrated the anticonvulsant effect of curcumin against PTZ i.v. seizure threshold via a direct or indirect activation of adenosine A(1) but not A(2A) receptors in mice. Thus, curcumin may prove to be an effective adjunct in treatment of convulsions. Copyright (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据