4.7 Article

Ginsenosidases and the pathogenicity of Pythium irregulare

期刊

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 78, 期 -, 页码 44-53

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.02.024

关键词

Ginseng; Pythium; Ginsenosides; Glycosidase; Pathogenicity

资金

  1. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Ontario Graduate Research Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L) produces triterpenoid saponins, ginsenosides, that possess mild fungitoxic activity toward some common ginseng leaf pathogens. However, numerous oomycete root pathogens of ginseng, most notably Pythium irregulare Buisman, are able to partially deglycosylate 20 (S)-protopanaxadiol ginsenosides Rb1, Rd and gypenoside XVII via extracellular glycosidases, leading to a common product, ginsenoside F2. Conversion of the common 20 (S)-protopanaxadiols into F2 requires both beta(1 -> 6) and beta(1 -> 2) glucosidase activity. In the present study, the ability of nine distinct isolates of P. irregulare, as well as a P. ultimum Trow isolate and two isolates of Trichoderma hamatum (Bonord.) Bainier, to deglycosylate 20 (S)-protopanaxadiols, in vitro was examined. The pathogenicity of each isolate was also examined by scoring the severity of disease symptoms caused by each in separate inoculations of one- and two-year old ginseng seedlings. Disease severity was scored using a disease severity index, as well as by taking F-v/F-m measurements of leaves during a 14-day infection period. Based on these measurements, it was concluded that (1) the use of direct F-v/F-m, measurements correlates strongly with observations of disease severity (R-2=0.79), and that (2) the pathogenicity of P. irregulare isolates correlates with their ability to deglycosylate ginsenosides (R-2=0.57). These results further support the hypothesis that the pathogenicity of P. irregulare on ginseng roots is dependent, in part, on the ability of this organism to deglycosylate ginsenosides. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据