4.5 Article

An Improved CTAB-Ammonium Acetate Method for Total RNA Isolation from Cotton

期刊

PHYTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 647-650

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pca.2368

关键词

CTAB; RNA isolation; ammonium acetate; cotton

资金

  1. China Ministry of Agriculture Transgenic Breeding Project [2009ZX08009-117B, 2009ZX08005-18B]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070156]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction Cotton is an important economic crop. Genetic, developmental and molecular studies of cotton require high-quality total RNA from different tissues. Due to the richness in polyphenols and polysaccharides, the Trizol-based methods and other commercial kits are unsuitable for RNA isolation from cotton. Available methods are generally laborious and time-consuming. Objective To develop an easy, simple and rapid cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)ammonium acetate protocol that takes less time and obtains high yield and quality of RNA from polysaccharide- and polyphenol-rich cotton tissues. Methodology Based on the original CTAB protocol, we used phenolchloroform and chloroformisoamyl alcohol to remove proteins, polysaccharides and polyphenols, and ammonium acetate to precipitate RNA, reducing the incubation time prior to RNA precipitation. After adding ammonium acetate to precipitate RNA, all centrifugation steps (14000 x g) were carried out at 4 degrees C to avoid degradation. Results The procedure took only 1.5 h and was suitable for different cotton tissues. The A(260):A(280) ratios ranged from 1.80 to 1.85 with clear 28 s and 18 s ribosomal RNA bands in 1.2% agarose gel. The isolated RNA was usable for downstream molecular studies, such as reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR. Conclusion The CTABammonium acetate method is easy, rapid, low-cost and effective for high-quality RNA isolation from polysaccharide- and polyphenol-rich cotton tissues. Copyright (c) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据