4.4 Article

Long-term reliability of the incremental shuttle walking test in clinically stable cardiovascular disease patients

期刊

PHYSIOTHERAPY
卷 96, 期 3, 页码 222-227

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.11.010

关键词

Incremental shuttle walking test; Exercise test; Long-term test-retest reliability; Cardiovascular disease; Cardiac rehabilitation

资金

  1. University of Essex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective The incremental shuttle walking test (ISWT) is a valuable tool for assessing changes in patients' functional capacity during cardiac rehabilitation. However, studies have only assessed its test-retest reliability in the short term. The purpose of this study was to examine long-term test-retest reliability of the ISWT in clinically stable cardiac patients. Design Test-retest reliability assessment. Setting Continuous, community-based phase IV cardiac rehabilitation centre. Participants Thirty patients with cardiovascular disease (15 males, 15 females; age 55 to 80 years) volunteered to participate in the study. Interventions Participants undertook two ISWTs, a minimum of 8 weeks apart. Main outcome measures ISWT performance in metres. Results Overall, the mean distance walked in the pre-test was 502 +/- 161 m and this did not differ from test to retest. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.80, indicating good test-retest reliability. Using the Bland and Altman method, there was a small mean test-retest difference (-7 m). The 95% limits of agreement were large, ranging from -203 m to 189 m. Conclusions Over long test-retest durations, there appears to be no learning effect in the ISWT, negating the need for a practice walk. The long-term random variation in the ISWT test is larger than in previous studies, probably due to greater physiological and psychological variation in the participants over 8 weeks compared with that seen in day-to-day testing. Factors influencing long-term test-retest reliability of the ISWT require further elucidation. (c) 2010 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据