4.5 Article

Mediators of allostasis and systemic toxicity in bipolar disorder

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 106, 期 1, 页码 46-50

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.10.029

关键词

Bipolar disorder; Allostatic load; Oxidative stress; Mitochondria; Glucocorticoids; Neurotrophins; Inflammation; Neuroprogression

资金

  1. Board of Trustees of Spanish Foundation of Psychiatry and Mental Health (FEPSM)
  2. AstraZeneca Foundation
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (Brazil)
  4. AstraZeneca
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  6. Eli Lilly
  7. Forest Research Institute
  8. Geodon Richter
  9. GlaxoSmithKline
  10. Janssen-Cilag
  11. Jazz
  12. Lundbeck
  13. Merck Sharp Dohme
  14. Novartis
  15. Otsuka
  16. Pfizer Inc
  17. Sanofi-Aventis
  18. Servier
  19. Takeda
  20. UBC
  21. CNPq
  22. CAPES
  23. NARSAD
  24. Stanley Medical Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bipolar disorder is associated with a high rate of medical and psychiatric comorbidities. This burden of illness, along with cognitive impairment, is seen particularly in late cases, after multiple episodes. These changes in clinical presentation that take place over time have been recently conceptualized as neuroprogression. The concept of allostatic load is instrumental in understanding how the cumulative stress associated with psychiatric disorders translates into bodily wear and tear, thus providing an underlying explanation for illness progression. Allostatic load is engendered by several factors which interact in a nonlinear manner. Glucocorticoids are fundamental mediators: when chronically in excess, glucocorticoids initiate a series of bodily dysfunctions that may include cortisol-related mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation and decrease in the expression of neuroprotective factors. In the present review we examine the role of allostatic load in the illness progression that takes place in bipolar disorder. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据