4.5 Article

Progesterone rapidly recruits female-typical opioid-induced hyperalgesic mechanisms

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 101, 期 5, 页码 759-763

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.08.018

关键词

Morphine; Hyperalgesia; Progesterone; NMDA receptors; Ovariectomy; Sex differences

资金

  1. Professional Staff Congress/City University of New York
  2. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [0842706] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Continuous morphine treatment can paradoxically increase nociception (i e hyperalgesia) in male and female mice but sex differences have been reported Here we studied progesterone modulation of these differences by assessing nociception on the tail-withdrawal test in male and female mice rendered hyperalgesic during continuous infusion of two different morphine doses (1 6 and 400 mg/kg/24 h) Although the lower morphine infusion dose increased nociception in both sexes by infusion Day 4 this hyperalgesia dissipated by Day 6 in males and ovariectomized females but not gonadally intact females A single subcutaneous progesterone (0 0016 mg/kg) injection to males and ovariectomized females on Day 6 caused hyperalgesia to recur within 30 min and to persist for a minimum of 120 min The larger morphine infusion dose also increased nociception in both sexes on Days 4 and 6 However the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (0 05 mg/kg) reversed hyperalgesia in males and ovariectomized females but not gonadally intact females on infusion Day 6 Subcutaneous progesterone (0 0016 mg/kg) injection inhibited this reversal in male and ovariectomized female mice but had no effect on nociception in saline-infused mice of either sex These data confirm our previous findings that male and female mice utilize distinct hyperalgesic mechanisms and show for the first time that a single progesterone bolus dose can recruit female-typical hyperalgesia in ovariectomized females and males (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据