4.5 Article

Selective gene expression by rat gastric corpus epithelium

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL GENOMICS
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 237-254

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00193.2010

关键词

transcriptome; stomach

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [DK-058333, DK-053642]
  2. US Department of Veterans Affairs
  3. German Research Foundation [STE 1765/1-1, GO 1718/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Goebel M, Stengel A, Lambrecht NW, Sachs G. Selective gene expression by rat gastric corpus epithelium. Physiol Genomics 43: 237-254, 2011. First published December 21, 2010; doi:10.1152/physiolgenomics.00193.2010.-The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is divided into several segments that have distinct functional properties, largely absorptive. The gastric corpus is the only segment thought of as largely secretory. Microarray hybridization of the gastric corpus mucosal epithelial cells was used to compare gene expression with other segments of the columnar GI tract followed by statistical data subtraction to identify genes selectively expressed by the rat gastric corpus mucosa. This provides a means of identifying less obvious specific functions of the corpus in addition to its secretion-related genes. For example, important properties found by this GI tract comparative transcriptome reflect the energy demand of acid secretion, a role in lipid metabolism, the large variety of resident neuroendocrine cells, responses to damaging agents and transcription factors defining differentiation of its epithelium. In terms of overlap of gastric corpus genes with the rest of the GI tract, the distal small bowel appears to express many of the gastric corpus genes in contrast to proximal small and large bowel. This differential map of gene expression by the gastric corpus epithelium will allow a more detailed description of major properties of the gastric corpus and may lead to the discovery of gastric corpus cell differentiation genes and those mis-regulated in gastric carcinomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据