4.4 Article

Magnetic reversal frequency scaling in dynamos with thermochemical convection

期刊

PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS
卷 229, 期 -, 页码 122-133

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2014.01.009

关键词

Geodynamo; Polarity reversals; Core convection; Geomagnetic dipole; Core-mantle boundary

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR-1135382]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scaling relationships are derived for the frequency of magnetic polarity reversals in numerical dynamos powered by thermochemical convection. We show that the average number of reversals per unit of time scales with the local Rossby number Ro(l) of the convection. With uniform core-mantle boundary (CMB) heat flux, polarity reversals are absent below a critical value Ro(lcrit) similar or equal to 0.05, beyond which reversal frequency increases approximately linearly with Rot. The relative standard deviation of the dipole intensity fluctuations increases with reversal frequency and Roe. With heterogeneous CMB heat flux that models the large-scale seismic heterogeneity in Earth's lower mantle, reversal frequency also exhibits linear dependence on Rot, and increases approximately as the square root of the amplitude of the CMB heterogeneity. Applied to the history of the geodynamo, these results imply lower CMB heat flux with Ro(l) <= Ro(lcrit) during magnetic superchrons and higher, more heterogeneous CMB heat flux with Ro(l) > Ro(lcrit) when geomagnetic reversals were frequent. They also suggest that polarity reversals may have been commonplace in the early history of other terrestrial planets. We find that zonal heterogeneity in CMB heat flux produces special effects. Close to Ro(lcrit) enhanced equatorial cooling at the CMB increases reversal frequency by concentrating magnetic flux at low latitudes, whereas far beyond Ro(lcrit) enhanced polar cooling at the CMB increases reversal frequency by amplifying outer core convection. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据