4.4 Article

Localized double-array stacking analysis of PcP: D and ULVZ structure beneath the Cocos plate, Mexico, central Pacific, and north Pacific

期刊

PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS
卷 173, 期 1-2, 页码 60-74

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2008.11.003

关键词

D ''; ULVZ; CMB; D '' Discontinuity; PcP; LLSVP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large, high quality P-wave data set comprising short-period and broadband signals sampling four separate regions in the lowermost mantle beneath the Cocos plate, Mexico, the central Pacific, and the north Pacific is analyzed using regional one-dimensional double-array stacking and modelling with reflectivity synthetics. A data-screening criterion retains only events with stable PcP energy in the final data stacks used for modelling and interpretation. This significantly improves the signal stacks relative to including unscreened observations. allows confident alignment on the PcP arrival and allows tight bounds to be placed on P-wave velocity structure above the core-mantle boundary (CMB). The PcP reflections under the Cocos plate are well modelled without any ultra-low velocity zone from 5 to 20 degrees N. At latitudes from 15 to 20 degrees N, we find evidence for two P-wave velocity discontinuities in the D '' region. The first is similar to 182 km above the CMB with a delta In V-P of +1.5%, near the same depth as a weaker discontinuity (<+0.5%) observed from 5 to 15 degrees N in prior work. The other reflector is similar to 454 km above the CMB, with a delta In V-P of +0.4%: this appears to be a shallower continuation of the joint P- and S-wave discontinuity previously detected south of 15 degrees N, which is presumed to be the perovskite to post-perovskite phase transition. The data stacks for paths bottoming below Mexico have PcP images that are well matched with the simple IASP91 structure, contradicting previous inferences of ULVZ presence in this region. These particular data are not very sensitive to any D '' discontinuities, and simply bound them to be

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据