4.7 Article

Comparison of very-large-scale motions of turbulent pipe and boundary layer simulations

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4802048

关键词

-

资金

  1. Creative Research Initiatives program of the National Research Foundation [2012-0000246]
  2. KISTI under the Strategic Supercomputing Support Program
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [R31-2012-000-10045-0, 2009-0081572] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A direct numerical simulation of a fully developed turbulent pipe flow was performed to investigate the similarities and differences of very-large-scale motions (VLSMs) to those of turbulent boundary layer (TBL) flows. The Reynolds number was set to Re-D = 35 000, and the computational domain was 30 pipe radii in length. Inspection of instantaneous fields, streamwise two-point correlations, and population trends of the momentum regions showed that the streamwise length of the structures in the pipe flow grew continuously beyond the log layer (gamma/delta < 0.3-0.4) with a large population of long structures (>3 delta), and the maximum length of the VLSMs increased up to similar to 30 delta. Such differences between the TBL and pipe flows arose due to the entrainment of large plumes of the intermittent potential flow in the TBL, creating break-down of the streamwise coherence of the structures above the log layer with the strong swirling strength and Reynolds shear stress. The average streamwise length scale of the pipe flow was approximately 1.5-3.0 times larger than that of the TBL through the log and wake regions. The maximum contribution of the structures to the Reynolds shear stress was observed at approximately 6 delta in length, whereas that of the TBL was at 1 delta-2 delta, indicating a higher contribution of the VLSMs to the Reynolds shear stress in the pipe flow than in the TBL flow. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4802048]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据