4.7 Article

Dynamics and rheology of concentrated, finite-Reynolds-number suspensions in a homogeneous shear flow

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4802844

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1133106]
  2. Laboratory Directed Research and Development Program of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1133106] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the lubrication-corrected force-coupling method for the simulation of concentrated suspensions under finite inertia. Suspension dynamics are investigated as a function of the particle-scale Reynolds number Re-(gamma) over dot and the bulk volume fraction phi in a homogeneous linear shear flow, in which Re-(gamma) over dot is defined from the density rho(f) and dynamic viscosity mu of the fluid, particle radius a, and the shear rate (gamma) over dot as Re-(gamma) over dot = rho(f)(gamma) over dota(2)/mu. It is shown that the velocity fluctuations in the velocity-gradient and vorticity directions decrease at larger Re-(gamma) over dot However, the particle self-diffusivity is found to be an increasing function of Re-(gamma) over dot as the motion of the suspended particles develops a longer auto-correlation under finite fluid inertia. It is shown that finite-inertia suspension flows are shear-thickening and the particle stresses become highly intermittent as Re-(gamma) over dot increases. To study the detailed changes in the suspension microstructure and rheology, we introduce a particle-stress-weighted pair-distribution function. The stress-weighted pair-distribution function clearly shows that the increase of the effective viscosity at high Re-(gamma) over dot is mostly related to the strong normal lubrication interaction in the compressive principal axis of the shear flow. (C) 2013 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据