4.7 Article

A modulated gradient model for scalar transport in large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4774342

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_132122]
  2. US National Science Foundation [ATM-0854766]
  3. NASA [NNG06GE256]
  4. Swiss National Supercomputing Centre [s306]
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [0854766] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a simple alternative to the standard eddy-diffusivity closure, a nonlinear subgrid-scale (SGS) flux model is introduced and implemented in simulations of a neutral atmospheric boundary layer and a stable atmospheric boundary layer. The new model computes the structure of the SGS flux (relative magnitude of the vector components) based on the normalized gradient vector, which is derived from the Taylor expansion of the exact SGS flux. The SGS magnitude is computed as the product of a SGS velocity scale and a SGS scalar concentration scale, which are estimated based on the local-equilibrium hypothesis. To resolve the instability issue of the original gradient model and ensure numerical stability, we adopt a clipping procedure to avoid local negative SGS dissipation rate of the scalar variance. The model formulation, using constant coefficients, is assessed through a systematic comparison with well-established theoretical predictions and reference results of various flow statistics. Simulation results obtained with the use of this new model show good agreement with the reference results and an evident improvement over results obtained using traditional eddy-diffusivity models. For instance, the new model can deliver the expected surface-layer similarity scalar profile and power-law scaling of the power spectrum of scalar fluctuation. (C) 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4774342]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据