4.7 Article

Fluctuating wall pressures measured beneath a supersonic turbulent boundary layer

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3609271

关键词

boundary layer turbulence; flow measurement; flow sensors; fluctuations; Mach number; pressure measurement; pressure transducers; supersonic flow; vibrations; wind tunnels

资金

  1. Sandia National Laboratories
  2. United States Department of Energy
  3. United States Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-AC04-94AL85000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wind tunnel experiments up to Mach 3 have provided fluctuating wall-pressure spectra beneath a supersonic turbulent boundary layer to frequencies reaching 400 kHz by combining data from piezoresistive silicon pressure transducers effective at low- and mid-range frequencies and piezoelectric quartz sensors to detect high frequency events. Data were corrected for spatial attenuation at high frequencies and for wind-tunnel noise and vibration at low frequencies. The resulting power spectra revealed the omega(-1) dependence for fluctuations within the logarithmic region of the boundary layer but are essentially flat at low frequency and do not exhibit the theorized omega(2) dependence. When normalized by outer flow variables, a slight dependence upon the Reynolds number is detected, but Mach number is the dominant parameter. Normalization by inner flow variables is largely successful for the omega(-1) region but does not apply for lower frequencies. A comparison of the pressure fluctuation intensities with 50 years of historical data shows their reported magnitude chiefly is a function of the frequency response of the sensors. The present corrected data yield results in excess of the bulk of the historical data, but uncorrected data are consistent with lower magnitudes, suggesting that much of the historical compressible database may be biased low. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3609271]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据