4.7 Article

Low-dimensional model of turbulent Rayleigh-Benard convection in a Cartesian cell with square domain

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3610395

关键词

convection; differential equations; eigenvalues and eigenfunctions; flow simulation; Galerkin method; numerical analysis; Rayleigh-Benard instability; turbulent diffusion

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  2. Julich Supercomputing Centre, Julich (Germany) [HIL02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A low-dimensional model (LDM) for turbulent Rayleigh-Beacutenard convection in a Cartesian cell with square domain, based on the Galerkin projection of the Boussinesq equations onto a finite set of empirical eigenfunctions, is presented. The empirical eigenfunctions are obtained from a joint proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) of the velocity and temperature fields using the snapshot method on the basis of direct numerical simulation (DNS). The resulting LDM is a quadratic inhomogeneous system of coupled ordinary differential equations which we use to describe the long-time temporal evolution of the large-scale mode amplitudes for a Rayleigh number of 10(5) and a Prandtl number of 0.7. The truncation to a finite number of degrees of freedom, which does not exceed a number of 310 for the present, requires the additional implementation of an eddy viscosity-diffusivity to capture the missing dissipation of the small-scale modes. The magnitude of this additional dissipation mechanism is determined by taking statistical stationarity and a total dissipation that corresponds with the original DNS data. We compare the performance of two models, a constant so-called Heisenberg viscosity-diffusivity and a mode-dependent or modal one. The latter viscosity-diffusivity model turns out to reproduce the large-scale properties of the turbulent convection qualitatively well, even for a model with only a few hundred POD modes. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3610395]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据