4.7 Article

Reduction of the Germano-identity error in the dynamic Smagorinsky model

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3140033

关键词

channel flow; error analysis; finite difference methods; flow simulation; predictor-corrector methods; turbulence; viscosity

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [N00014-08-1-0433]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We revisit the Germano-identity error in the dynamic modeling procedure in the sense that the current modeling procedure to obtain the dynamic coefficient may not truly minimize the error in the mean and global sense. A corrector step to the conventional dynamic Smagorinsky model is proposed to obtain a corrected eddy viscosity which further reduces the error. The change in resolved velocity due to the coefficient variation as well as nonlocal nature of the filter and flow unsteadiness is accounted for by a simplified suboptimal control formalism without resorting to the adjoint equations. The objective function chosen is the Germano-identity error integrated over the entire computational volume and pathline. In order to determine corrected eddy viscosity, the Freacutechet derivative of the objective function is directly evaluated by a finite-differencing formula in an efficient predictor-corrector-type framework. The proposed model is applied to decaying isotropic turbulence and turbulent channel flow at various Reynolds numbers and resolutions to obtain noticeable reduction in the Germano-identity error and significantly improved flow statistics. From channel flow large-eddy simulation, it is shown that conventional dynamic model underestimates subgrid scale eddy viscosity when the resolution gets coarse, and this underestimation is responsible for increased anisotropy of predicted Reynolds stress. The proposed model raises both the overall and near-wall subgrid scale eddy viscosity to reduce exaggerated Reynolds stress anisotropy and yield significantly improved flow statistics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据