4.7 Article

On turbulent entrainment and dissipation in dilute polymer solutions

期刊

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
卷 21, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3097006

关键词

flow visualisation; fluid oscillations; polymer solutions; stratified flow; turbulence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a comparative experimental study of a turbulent flow developing in clear water and dilute polymer solutions (25 and 50 wppm polyethylene oxide). The flow is forced by a planar grid that oscillates vertically with stroke S and frequency f in a square container of initially still fluid. Two-component velocity fields are measured in a vertical plane passing through the center of the tank by using time resolved particle image velocimetry. After the forcing is initiated, a turbulent layer develops that is separated from the initially irrotational fluid by a sharp interface, the so-called turbulent/nonturbulent interface (TNTI). The turbulent region grows in time through entrainment of surrounding fluid until the fluid in the whole container is in turbulent motion. From the comparison of the experiments in clear water and polymer solutions we conclude: (i) Polymer additives modify the large scale shape of the TNTI. (ii) Both, in water and in the polymer solution the mean depth of the turbulent layer, H(t), follows the theoretical prediction for Newtonian fluids H(t)proportional to Kt, where K proportional to S(2)f is the grid action. (iii) We find a larger grid action for dilute polymer solutions than for water. As a consequence, the turbulent kinetic energy of the flow increases and the rate of energy input becomes higher. (iv) The entrainment rate beta=v(e)/v(rms) (where v(e)=dH/dt is the interface propagation velocity and v(rms) is the root mean square of the vertical velocity) is lower for polymers (beta(p)approximate to 0.7) than for water (beta(w)approximate to 0.8). The measured values for beta are in good agreement with similarity arguments, from which we estimate that in our experiment about 28% of the input energy is dissipated by polymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据