4.8 Article

Modulation Instability Induced Frequency Comb Generation in a Continuously Pumped Optical Parametric Oscillator

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 121, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.093903

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca
  2. Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale (Project NOICE Joint Laboratory)
  3. Rutherford Discovery Fellowships
  4. Marsden fund of the Royal Society of New Zealand
  5. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [GA-2015-713694]
  6. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Minobrnauka) [14.Y26.31.0017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Continuously pumped passive nonlinear cavities can be harnessed for the creation of novel optical frequency combs. While most research has focused on third-order Kerr nonlinear interactions, recent studies have shown that frequency comb formation can also occur via second-order nonlinear effects. Here, we report on the formation of quadratic combs in optical parametric oscillator (OPO) configurations. Specifically, we demonstrate that optical frequency combs can be generated in the parametric region around half of the pump frequency in a continuously driven OPO. We also model the OPO dynamics through a single time-domain mean-field equation, identifying previously unknown dynamical regimes, induced by modulation instabilities, which lead to comb formation. Numerical simulation results are in good agreement with experimentally observed spectra. Moreover, the analysis of the coherence properties of the simulated spectra shows the existence of correlated and phase-locked combs. Our results reveal previously unnoticed dynamics of an apparently well assessed optical system, and can lead to a new class of frequency comb sources that may stimulate novel applications by enabling straightforward access to elusive spectral regions, such as the midinfrared.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据