4.7 Article

Packing and self-assembly of truncated triangular bipyramids

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.012127

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOD/ASDRE [N00244-09-1-0062]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE 0624807]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering [DE-FG02-02ER46000]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  5. NSF MSPRF [DMS-120468]
  6. University of Michigan Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivated by breakthroughs in the synthesis of faceted nano- and colloidal particles, as well as theoretical and computational studies of their packings, we investigate a family of truncated triangular bipyramids. We report dense periodic packings with small unit cells that were obtained via numerical and analytical optimization. The maximal packing fraction phi(max) changes continuously with the truncation parameter t. Eight distinct packings are identified based on discontinuities in the first and second derivatives of phi(max)(t). These packings differ in the number of particles in the fundamental domain (unit cell) and the type of contacts between the particles. In particular, we report two packings with four particles in the unit cell for which both phi(max)(t) and phi'(max)(t) are continuous and the discontinuity occurs in the second derivative only. In the self-assembly simulations that we perform for larger boxes with 2048 particles, only one out of eight packings is found to assemble. In addition, the degenerate quasicrystal reported previously for triangular bipyramids without truncation [Haji-Akbari et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 215702 (2011)] assembles for truncations as high as 0.45. The self-assembly propensities for the structures formed in the thermodynamic limit are explained using the isoperimetric quotient of the particles and the coordination number in the disordered fluid and in the assembled structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据