4.7 Article

Curvature versus distances: Testing the FLRW cosmology

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.023012

关键词

-

资金

  1. Madrid Regional Government (CAM) under the program HEPHACOS [S2009/ESP-1473-02]
  2. MICINN [AYA2009-13936-C06-06]
  3. Consolider-Ingenio PAU [CSD2007-00060]
  4. European Union Marie Curie Initial Training Network UNILHC [PITN-GA-2009-237920]
  5. Spanish MICINNs Juan de la Cierva program [JCI-2010-08112]
  6. CICYT [FPA-2012-31880]
  7. Madrid Regional Government (CAM) through the project HEPHACOS [S2009/ESP-1473, P-ESP-00346]
  8. European Union FP7 ITN INVISIBLES (Marie Curie Actions) [PITN-GA-2011-289442]
  9. Spanish MINECO's Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa Program [SEV-2012-0249]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We test the FLRW cosmology by reconstructing in a model-independent way both the Hubble parameter H(z) and the comoving distance D(z) via the most recent Hubble and Supernovae Ia data. In particular we use data binning with direct error propagation, the principal component analysis, the genetic algorithms and the Pade approximation. Using our reconstructions we evaluate the Clarkson et al. test known as Omega(K) (z), whose value is constant in redshift for the standard cosmological model, but deviates otherwise. Using present data, we find good agreement with the expected values of the standard cosmological model within the experimental errors, which are, however, large enough to allow for alternative cosmologies. A discrimination between the models may be possible for more precise future data. Finally, we provide forecasts, exploiting the baryon acoustic oscillation measurements from the Euclid survey.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据