4.7 Article

Scalar, electromagnetic, and gravitational perturbations of Kerr-Newman black holes in the slow-rotation limit

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 88, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.064048

关键词

-

资金

  1. NRHEP-295189 FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IRSES
  2. FCT-Portugal through PTDC [FIS/098025/2008, FIS/098032/2008, CERN/FP/123593/2011]
  3. NSF CAREER [PHY-1055103]
  4. European Community [aStronGR-2011-298297]
  5. NICS Kraken through NSF [PHY-090003]
  6. [AECT-2012-3-0012]
  7. [AECT-2012-2-0014]
  8. [AECT-2012-3-0011]
  9. [CESGA-ICTS-234]
  10. Division Of Physics
  11. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1055103] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Einstein-Maxwell theory, according to classic uniqueness theorems, the most general stationary black-hole solution is the axisymmetric Kerr-Newman metric, which is defined by three parameters: mass, spin and electric charge. The radial and angular dependence of gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations in the Kerr-Newman geometry do not seem to be separable. In this paper we circumvent this problem by studying scalar, electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations of Kerr-Newman black holes in the slow-rotation limit. We extend (and provide details of) the analysis presented in a recent Letter [P. Pani, E. Berti, and L. Gualtieri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 241103 (2013)]. Working at linear order in the spin, we present the first detailed derivation of the axial and polar perturbation equations in the gravito-electromagnetic case, and we compute the corresponding quasinormal modes for any value of the electric charge. Our study is the first self-consistent stability analysis of the Kerr-Newman metric, and in principle it can be extended to any order in the small rotation parameter. We find numerical evidence that the axial and polar sectors are isospectral at first order in the spin and speculate on the possible implications of this result.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据