4.7 Article

Bilocal baryon interpolating fields with three flavors

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 88, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.036013

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11205011]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Serbian Ministry of Science and Technological Development [OI 171037, III 41011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fierz identities follow from permutations of quark indices and thus determine which chiral multiplets of baryon fields are Pauli allowed and which are not. In a previous paper we investigate the Fierz identities of baryon fields with two light flavors and find that all bilocal fields that can be constructed from three quarks are Pauli allowed. That does not mean that all possible chiral multiplets exist; however, some chiral multiplets do not appear among structures with a given spin in the local limit, say J = 1/2. One such chiral multiplet is the [(6, 3) circle plus (3, 6)], which is necessary for a successful chiral mixing phenomenology. In the present paper we extend those methods to three light flavors, i. e., to SUF(3) symmetry and explicitly construct all three necessary chiral SUL(3) x SUR(3) multiplets, viz. [(6, 3) circle plus (3, 6)], (3, (3) over bar) circle plus ((3) over tilde, 3)], and [((3) over bar, 3) circle plus (3, (3) over bar] that are necessary for a phenomenologically successful chiral mixing. We complete this analysis by considering some bilocal baryon fields that are sufficient for the construction of the missing spin-1/2 baryon interpolating fields. Bilocal baryon fields have definite total angular momentum only in the local limit. The physical significance of these results lies in the fact that they show that there is no need for higher Fock space components, such as the q(4)(q) over bar, in the baryon chiral mixing framework, for the purpose of fitting the observed axial couplings and magnetic moments: all of the sufficient mirror components exist as bilocal fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据