标题
Cosmological tests of general relativity: A principal component analysis
作者
关键词
-
出版物
PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 85, Issue 4, Pages -
出版商
American Physical Society (APS)
发表日期
2012-02-07
DOI
10.1103/physrevd.85.043508
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- SEVEN-YEARWILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
- (2011) E. Komatsu et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
- Testing gravity with CAMB and CosmoMC
- (2011) Alireza Hojjati et al. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
- Towards a fully consistent parametrization of modified gravity
- (2011) Tessa Baker et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Complementarity of weak lensing and peculiar velocity measurements in testing general relativity
- (2011) Yong-Seon Song et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Testing general relativity at cosmological scales: Implementation and parameter correlations
- (2011) Jason N. Dossett et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- New constraints on parametrised modified gravity from correlations of the CMB with large scale structure
- (2010) Tommaso Giannantonio et al. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
- Weak lensing predictions for modified gravities at non-linear scales
- (2010) Emma Beynon et al. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
- Probing modifications of general relativity using current cosmological observations
- (2010) Gong-Bo Zhao et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- How to optimally parametrize deviations from general relativity in the evolution of cosmological perturbations
- (2010) Levon Pogosian et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Linear growth rate of structure in parametrized post-Friedmannian universes
- (2010) Pedro G. Ferreira et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Testing general relativity with current cosmological data
- (2010) Scott F. Daniel et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Current constraints on the cosmic growth history
- (2010) Rachel Bean et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Investigating dark energy experiments with principal components
- (2009) Robert G Crittenden et al. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
- Catastrophic photometric redshift errors: weak-lensing survey requirements
- (2009) Gary Bernstein et al. MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
- Consistent cosmological modifications to the Einstein equations
- (2009) Constantinos Skordis PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Searching for modified growth patterns with tomographic surveys
- (2009) Gong-Bo Zhao et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Cluster constraints onf(R)gravity
- (2009) Fabian Schmidt et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Cosmological Tests of General Relativity with Future Tomographic Surveys
- (2009) Gong-Bo Zhao et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Approaches to understanding cosmic acceleration
- (2009) Alessandra Silvestri et al. REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS
- DISTANCE, GROWTH FACTOR, AND DARK ENERGY CONSTRAINTS FROM PHOTOMETRIC BARYON ACOUSTIC OSCILLATION AND WEAK LENSING MEASUREMENTS
- (2008) Hu Zhan et al. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
- Measuring the dark side (with weak lensing)
- (2008) Luca Amendola et al. JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS
- Evolution of galaxy bias, generalized
- (2008) Lam Hui et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Distinguishing modified gravity from dark energy
- (2008) Edmund Bertschinger et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Next generation redshift surveys and the origin of cosmic acceleration
- (2008) Viviana Acquaviva et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Large scale structure as a probe of gravitational slip
- (2008) Scott F. Daniel et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Observational tests of modified gravity
- (2008) Bhuvnesh Jain et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- Pattern of growth in viablef(R)cosmologies
- (2008) Levon Pogosian et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
- How to distinguish dark energy and modified gravity?
- (2008) Hao Wei et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started