4.7 Article

Azimuthal asymmetries for hadron distributions inside a jet in hadronic collisions

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 83, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.034021

关键词

-

资金

  1. Regione Autonoma della Sardegna (RAS)
  2. Italian Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca Scientifica (MIUR) under Cofinanziamento Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale
  3. European Community [227431]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using a generalized parton model approach including spin and intrinsic parton motion effects, and assuming the validity of factorization for large-p(T) jet production in hadronic collisions, we study the azimuthal distribution around the jet axis of leading unpolarized or (pseudo) scalar hadrons, namely pions, produced in the jet fragmentation process. We identify the observable leading-twist azimuthal asymmetries for the unpolarized and single-polarized case related to quark and gluon-originated jets. We account for all physically allowed combinations of the transverse momentum-dependent (TMD) parton distribution and fragmentation functions, with special attention to the Sivers, Boer-Mulders, and transversity quark distributions, and to the Collins fragmentation function for quarks (and to the analogous functions for gluons). For each of these effects we evaluate, at central and forward rapidities and for kinematical configurations accessible at BNL-RHIC, the corresponding potentially maximized asymmetry (for pi(+) production), obtained by saturating natural positivity bounds (and the Soffer bound for transversity) for the distribution and fragmentation functions involved and summing additively all partonic contributions. We then estimate, for both neutral and charged pions, the asymmetries involving TMD functions for which parametrizations are available. We also study the role of the different mechanisms, and the corresponding transverse single-spin asymmetries, for large-p(T) inclusive-jet production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据