4.7 Article

Forward-backward asymmetry in top quark-antiquark production

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 84, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.112005

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE
  2. NSF (USA)
  3. CEA
  4. CNRS/IN2P3 (France)
  5. FASI
  6. Rosatom
  7. RFBR (Russia)
  8. CNPq
  9. FAPERJ
  10. FAPESP
  11. FUNDUNESP (Brazil)
  12. DAE
  13. DST (India)
  14. Colciencias (Colombia)
  15. CONACyT (Mexico)
  16. KRF
  17. KOSEF (Korea)
  18. CONICET
  19. UBACyT (Argentina)
  20. FOM (The Netherlands)
  21. STFC
  22. Royal Society (United Kingdom)
  23. MSMT
  24. GACR (Czech Republic)
  25. CRC
  26. NSERC (Canada)
  27. BMBF
  28. DFG (Germany)
  29. SFI (Ireland)
  30. Swedish Research Council (Sweden)
  31. CAS
  32. CNSF (China)
  33. STFC [PP/E000487/1, ST/F00754X/1, ST/F007418/1, ST/H00095X/1, ST/J501074/1, ST/H00095X/2, ST/I505756/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  34. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H00095X/2, PP/E000487/1, ST/J501074/1, ST/H00095X/1, ST/F007418/1, ST/I505756/1, ST/F00754X/1, PP/D004284/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  35. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a measurement of forward-backward asymmetry in top quark-antiquark production in proton-antiproton collisions in the final state containing a lepton and at least four jets. Using a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 5.4 fb(-1), collected by the D0 experiment at the Fermilab Tevatron Collider, we measure the t (t) over bar forward-backward asymmetry to be (9.2 +/- 3.7)% at the reconstruction level. When corrected for detector acceptance and resolution, the asymmetry is found to be (19.6 +/- 6.5)%. We also measure a corrected asymmetry based on the lepton from a top quark decay, found to be (15.2 +/- 4.0)%. The results are compared to predictions based on the next-to-leading-order QCD generator MC@NLO. The sensitivity of the measured and predicted asymmetries to the modeling of gluon radiation is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据