4.5 Article

Quasi-stellar neutrons from the 7Li(p,n)7Be reaction with an energy-broadened proton beam

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
卷 85, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.85.055810

关键词

-

资金

  1. EC-JRC
  2. IAEC
  3. Pazi Foundation
  4. German-Israel Foundation (GIF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neutrons produced by the Li-7(p, n)Be-7 reaction close to the reaction threshold are widely used to measure the cross section of s-process nucleosynthesis reactions. While experiments have been performed so far with Van de Graaff accelerators, future use of rf accelerators with higher intensities is planned to enable investigations on radioactive targets. Such accelerators have, however, poorer energy definition. We investigate in this work the effects of an energy-broadened proton beam on the spectrum of neutrons emitted in the thick-target Li-7(p, n) reaction at E-p = 1912 keV and on the experimental cross section of the Au-197(n,gamma) Au-198 reaction in these conditions. Measurements were made with the bunched and chopped proton beam at the Van de Graaff facility of the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements using the time-of-flight technique, both with a narrow-energy proton beam (standard deviation of the distribution sigma approximate to 1.5 keV) and with a broad-energy proton beam (sigma approximate to 20 keV) obtained with a gold foil degrader. Neutron spectra measured with the narrow-energy proton beam are consistent with those previously reported. The angle-integrated spectrum obtained with the broad-energy proton beam more closely resembles a Maxwellian-flux distribution. The measured neutron spectra agree well with Monte Carlo simulations that include experimentally measured cross sections, two-body kinematics and proton energy loss in the target. Gold activation studies were performed for both narrow-energy and broad-energy proton beams to check the impact of the ensuing spectra on this important reference standard for activation measurements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据