4.6 Article

Magnetic ground state of pyrochlore oxides close to metal-insulator boundary probed by muon spin rotation

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 82, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.094413

关键词

-

资金

  1. KEK-MSL Inter-University
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The magnetism of ruthenium pyrochlore oxides A(2)Ru(2)O(7) (A=Hg, Cd, and Ca), whose electronic properties within a localized ion picture are characterized by nondegenerate t(2g) orbitals (Ru5+, 4d(3)) and thereby subjected to geometrical frustration, has been investigated by the muon spin rotation/relaxation (mu SR) technique. The A cation (mostly divalent) was varied to examine the effect of covalency (Hg > Cd > Ca) on the electronic property of the oxides. In a sample with A= Hg, which exhibits a clear metal-insulator (MI) transition below similar to 100 K (associated with a weak structural transition), a nearly commensurate magnetic order is observed to develop in accordance with MI transition. Meanwhile, in the case of A=Cd, where the MI transition is suppressed to the level of small anomaly in the resistivity, the local-field distribution probed by muons indicates emergence of a certain magnetic inhomogeneity below similar to 30 K. Moreover, in Ca2Ru2O7, which remains metallic, highly inhomogeneous local magnetism is found below similar to 25 K; this magnetism arises from randomly oriented Ru moments and thus is described as a frozen spin-liquid state. The systematic trend of increasing randomness and itinerant character with decreasing covalency suggests a close relationship between the two characters. To understand the effect of orbital degeneracy and associated Jahn-Teller instability, we examine a tetravalent ruthenium pyrochlore, Tl2Ru2O7 (Ru4+, 4d(4)). The result of mu SR indicates a nonmagnetic ground state that is consistent with the formation of the Haldane chains suggested by the neutron-diffraction experiment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据