4.6 Article

Structural study of amorphous CoFeB thin films exhibiting in-plane uniaxial magnetic anisotropy

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 79, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.014203

关键词

amorphous magnetic materials; bond lengths; boron alloys; cobalt alloys; density functional theory; electron diffraction; ferromagnetic materials; iron alloys; magnetic anisotropy; magnetic structure; magnetic thin films; magnetic transitions; Monte Carlo methods; stoichiometry

资金

  1. Royal Academy of Engineering
  2. EPSRC-GB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure of amorphous ferromagnetic Co40Fe40B20 thin films, in particular the origin of induced magnetic in-plane anisotropy, is investigated by reduced density function (RDF) analysis of electron-diffraction patterns. In this research, the RDF methodology is developed in order to measure the direction-dependent bond lengths and coordination numbers. The directional variations in these parameters are predicted to be the likely origins of induced anisotropy. With nearest-neighbor distances measured to an accuracy of 0.02 A, no variations in the characteristic bond lengths with direction are observed. By studying the coordination numbers, it is shown that any directional ordering effect must be less than 5% and 1% for transition-metal-metalloid and transition metal-transition metal neighbors, respectively, in CoFeB films subjected to a 400 Oe magnetic field during deposition. The overall structure of Co40Fe40B20 thin films is further investigated by reverse Monte Carlo simulations, which enable an estimation of the coordination number of the transition-metal components in the CoFeB alloy. These simulations find a range of local coordination polyhedra present in the material. Despite an average coordination number of approximately 8 for the transition-metal component, a degree of medium-range order, and a stoichiometry close to Co50Fe50, large local deviations from this octahedral value mean that the structure is not based on bcc-type basic units.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据