4.6 Article

Aerosol deposition-based micropatterning of barium titanate via sulphur hexafluoride inductively coupled plasma etching

期刊

VACUUM
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 49-53

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2014.12.028

关键词

Micropattern formation; Aerosol deposition; Barium titanate; Sulphur hexafluoride; Inductively coupled plasma etching

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2011-0030079]
  2. Korean government (MEST) [2012R1A1A2004366]
  3. Korean government (MSIP) [2014R1A1A1005901]
  4. Kwangwoon University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aerosol deposition (AD) is an advantageous alternative to the conventional thin film deposition method and thermal spray coating technology; this process is a very attractive method for micropatterning barium titanate (BTO) materials. AD features a high deposition rate, low process temperatures, fine patterning for miniaturisation, and improved device performance for many applications, such as RF components, dynamic random access memory, micro-electro-mechanical systems, and optical devices. In this study, BTO micropatterns deposited by AD are combined with inductively coupled plasma (ICP) etching technology in SF6/O-2/Ar plasmas to yield a lateral resolution reaching approximately 500 nm, which is at least 10 times smaller than the resolutions achieved by other recent deposition technologies. The experimental results indicate that adding the appropriate quantities of O-2 and Ar to SF6 can improve the etching properties by increasing the etching rate of BTO films while decreasing the surface roughness of the Pt layers. The maximum etching rate is 67.5 nm/min when the SF6/O-2/Ar composition is 75/5/10 sccm, which is 15 times faster than the conventional plasma etching process. In this study, the micropatterning of AD-deposited BTO films is systematically investigated and analysed while using sulphur hexafluoride ICP etching. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据